If any of you all think that SARMS aren't suppressive.
I was on a 10 week cycle of Ostarine, and LGD.
Labs just came back at 90ng/dl.
If any of you all think that SARMS aren't suppressive.
I was on a 10 week cycle of Ostarine, and LGD.
Labs just came back at 90ng/dl.
Damn that worries me. I'm just about to start a SARM cycle for 12 weeks.Originally Posted by AdamW
Good news: PCT is a thing. Don't worry too much.
No doubt that SARMS are suppressive. It's been stated multiple times. AAS are suppressive as well. Why is everyone ok with running SARMS without Test, it's a taboo cycle if there's no Test.
I hope you make a full comeback man!
My doc is concerned lol.. I've been on clomid since last monday. She did labs last tuesday. So hopefully when I go back it will show some improvement.
Did you tell your doc about your cycle? Maybe you need to up the dose of Clomid or add in tamoxifen since you are so suppressed?
No, I didn't tell her.
I'm gonna up the dose to 50mg for the next week or 2. I was under the impression I didn't need much clomid for SARMS.. but it REALLY suppressed my test..
I would, just so she knows what's going on and can better help you. She will probably write you a prescription for Tamoxifen. Easier to get it that way unless you have a local source.
I think we all underestimated the suppressiveness of ostarine.
Don't keep her in the dark tell her what you've done. She might look down the wrong road like mri on pituitary or Varicocele.
Also, if you think she may not treat because thinking its AAS.. Tell her it was "Supplements" you can buy at a nutrition store, you had no idea it could cause any effects like what your experience is now. Then she may be willing to go the extra distance to get you back on track. Besides its a legit kind of statement and she could even put it that way in her report, if she needed to, with no repercussions to either of you.
Yes. They are suppressive at "bodybuilder" doses. The doses in trials that showed no or little suppression were very small.
Reply With Quote