• Forum Login or
  • Register
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1 5th June 2017 
    Desperado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    18
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    CJC1295 DAC vs Ibutamoren

    Which one you think would be more effective in increasing HGH/IGF-1 levels? CJC1295 DAC or MK-677?
    Last edited by Desperado; 5th June 2017 at 11:33 AM.
  2. #2 5th June 2017 
    zholtok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    101
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    If I had to choose between them then I'd choose MK-677 because it's stronger in my opinion.

    But in general MK-677 and CJC1295 are completely different. CJC1295 is growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) but MK-677 works similarly to GHRP's, it stimulates your body to release more pulses while CJC1295 simply amplifies the pulse your body produces. CJC1295 DAC, without GHRP, is pretty much worthless, it's good only when used together with GHRP.
  3. #3 9th June 2017 
    Edz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    217
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
    There is no point in using CJC1295 DAC without a GHRP or any GHRH without GHRP. Because GHRH simply amplifies the pulse created by GHRP but if there is no pulse then it will not do anything.

Similar Threads

  1. Ibutamoren side effects
    By ArthurGain in forum Peptides Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 8th June 2017, 08:39 AM
  2. Ibutamoren
    By Popeye in forum Peptides Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 24th May 2017, 11:48 AM
  3. my experience with Ostarine, Ibutamoren, RAD140
    By jarofhearts in forum Peptides Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 23rd May 2017, 08:41 AM
  4. Ostarine, Ibutamoren on PCT
    By an1mal in forum Peptides Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 13th May 2017, 05:32 AM

Tags for this Thread