muscle gains ghrp-2 vs 6

[wee man]

GHRP2 seems to be the product of choice for many on this board due to the absence of the appetite stimulating side-effect (along with around 30% greater efficacy)

Since GHRP6 is a powerful appetite stimulant I'm wondering if the net muscle gain is greater than with GHRP2 despite giving a smaller GH pulse. Obviously you would need have the right macro-nutrient ratio but if the general goal was to increase muscle mass, is it better to go for GHRP6 because you're able to consume more calories?

One could always switch to GHRP2 pretty much instantly if the weight gain became more than desirable? Perhaps even cycle between the two with the MOD GRF (1-29) running in the background.

[hulk]

Ghrp-6 will stimulate hunger through ghrelin. Eat more calories than can possibly be synthesised into muscle tissue what are you left with? Fat storage. So more weight? Yes. More muscle? No.

If you were UNDEREATING macros and the ghrelin increases allowed you to keet requirements then yes the possibility for more LBM is definately there.

Final scenario you are earing requirement macros and you DONT consume more calories if using GHRP6! Then I would infer that the use of GHRP2 could lead to an advantageous (over GHRP6) body composition change simply due to the "30% " increase in GH output.

[hulk]

Apologies for spelling mistakes due to fat thumbs on iphone :-(