• Forum Login or
  • Register
Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1 4th July 2014 
    Semin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,579
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 46 Times in 43 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15

    Tanning Alternative That Prevents Skin Cancer Burried by USA Gov't

    By Todd Lee M.D.
    2014

    What if I told you there was a drug that prevented skin cancer, prevented diabetes, cured impotence and made you look better? You would say if a drug was this great, you would have heard of it. Which might be true if not for the FDA. For almost a decade Europeans have been benefiting from the miracle drug Melanotan II. In fact in 2009 a poll of Norwegian pharmacies deduced that 10,000 syringes were used by Melanotan users. That's one country. One year.

    Want to know the biggest irony? It was developed in Arizona in 1996. It was developed to prevent skin cancer because it causes the user to get a tan. Because of this Britain and Norway are favorites of it. You see, the FDA won’t legalize it because it was being researched for release as a separate drug, one that causes erections.

    Let me clarify this, a drug was developed in the United States for prevention of skin cancer that protects you from sunlight by giving you a tan. It had the side effect of erections. Because of the greed of corporate America, since there is more money in erections than preventing cancer, the drug has been tied up in testing for 18 years. Meanwhile, all of Europe is using it for over a decade. What’s the FDA’s excuse? They claim it causes skin cancer. WTF you ask? Let me explain the science.

    Put Your Depends On, This Is Gonna Be Rough!

    Sunlight has ultraviolet beams. 3 types penetrate our ozone. A, B, and C. Sunlight has lots of A which do the least damage and create a superficial tan which is short lived and doesn’t cause melanocytes to release more melanin, it only darkens existing melanin. Type B rays do way more DNA damage and subsequently the body makes permanent changes to protect against the damage. The melanocytes release more melanin to protect the body. This allows the body to get darker faster when exposed to UVA beams. C and the high energy beams ionize atmospheric nitrogen and* reflect off the ozone respectively. Clouds filter the light and protect people from the sun. Arizona is sunny, Norway is not. So with more sunlight hitting the skin of people you get more skin cancer. There is damage to the DNA.* UVA does single strand breakage, and UVB does double strand breakage and causes non functional bonds. If the DNA repair does not happen right, skin cancer may result. Eventually, given enough UV radiation all people will get skin cancer.

    Genetics of the repair mechanism is half the reason why some people get skin cancer and others don’t. The other half of the genetics is their natural propensity for skin pigmentation. Melanocytes are cells in the skin that release melanin. Melanin is what gives pigment. Brown hair, brown eyes, brown skin all come from melanin. Fair skin, blonde hair and blue eyes are due to double recessive genes for low melanin.* So in prehistoric times people who had sunny climate like Africa evolved to have melanin, the dark pigmentation protected their skin from the UV damage. In places cloudy and cold like Norway, my ancestors developed light pigmentation to allow as much UV light as possible in since that UV energy was necessary to form Vitamin D.* 20 minutes for fair people of direct sunlight can generate as much as 1000 iu of Vitamin D.

    How is this relevant? Well when you take people whose ancestors come from Norway and put them in a sunny desert like Arizona their skin doesn’t have the melanin armor to protect it from the sun. Subsequently fair people are the ones most susceptible to skin cancer]
    Tanning is a way of exposing yourself to controlled amounts of UV light to change the skin color, after exposure to damaging UVB rays the melanocytes release more melanin to protect the body from more sunlight damage. It's a risky proposition though, to expose yourself to sunlight to protect yourself from sunlight.

    Alpha Melanocyte stimulating hormone binds to receptors all over your body. One of these receptors is on the melanocyte. This bonding of hormone and receptor stimulates melanin release. University of Arizona researchers correctly hypothesized that injecting a-MSH would cause the melanocytes to release melanin, but the hormone had to short a half life. They modified it to have a longer half life and to stimulate the melanocyte 1000 times more effectively!
    This they christened “Melanotan”. When tested on men they found that 5 hours after administration erections were a side effect.

    Now 18 years later it still isn’t legal. The erection side effect has resulted in the big money pharmaceutical companies using their influence over our corrupt government to sequester the life saving technology so they can have the next billion dollar industry changer like Viagra or Prilosec. Pharma companies accountants sacrificing thousands of lives to get a bigger paycheck. Only in America. No literally, only in America.
    In the civilized countries of Europe where politicians are less corrupt this drug is used widespread. Like I said, 10,000 doses were used in 2009 in Norway alone. One country, one year. It also up regulates GLUT-4 transporter activity so it shuttles glucose into skeletal muscle. This would improve insulin sensitivity and combat diabetes, aid muscle building, and aid fat loss.*

    Do you know someone who was fair and died of skin cancer in the last 18 years? Do you miss them? Thank the FDA. Their argument is that melanocyte stimulation can cause melanoma. That dark moles may become irregular. One has to have moles and freckles for this to happen though. So not all people are going to get dark spots, but all people will be protected from sunlight. So to protect some, they condemn all.* Faulty logic at best
  2. #2 4th July 2014 
    darryl d.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    41
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Tanning Alternative That Prevents Skin Cancer Burried by USA Gov't

    Very interesting. The author obviously knows the subject. Does he have any credentials other than the title?
  3. #3 5th July 2014 
    peptideguru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    798
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Tanning Alternative That Prevents Skin Cancer Burried by USA Gov't

    "
    Very interesting. The author obviously knows the subject. Does he have any credentials other than the title?
    "


    Not sure if this is the same Todd Lee, but it probably is.
    http://toddleemd.wordpress.com/about/
    Site hasn't been update since 2012 but there are a few other references to him on the internet.


    Regards,
    Tom
  4. #4 10th August 2014 
    melanotano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    298
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Tanning Alternative That Prevents Skin Cancer Burried by USA Gov't

    EU has blocked Melanotan, shutting down all websites and seize shipments, as well as issuing a fine to the consumer.
  5. #5 10th August 2014 
    peptideguru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    798
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Tanning Alternative That Prevents Skin Cancer Burried by USA Gov't

    "
    EU has blocked Melanotan, shutting down all websites and seize shipments, as well as issuing a fine to the consumer.
    "

    Do you have a source for this? The shutting down sites is the only one we've heard of (and has been an ongoing process for almost 3 years).

    Tom
  6. #6 10th August 2015 
    sbatz72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    47
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I would tell you this is typical of the United States Food and Drug Administration and the United States Government. I would like to know why we are forced to eat and drink bromide and other cancer causing chemicals in our food supply. Oh, because the insurance companies, doctors, and United States government make a ton of cash on the treatments of cancer.
  7. #7 11th August 2015 
    cnunamaker1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    3
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I would not be surprised if the government had a cancer free way of tanning and did not share it with us. I feel like the government has many cure and alternative methods of dealing with many things that they do not share with us. The person who wrote the article definitely knows what they are talking about. Maybe one day this method of tanning will be revealed but it probably won't happen in our life time.
  8. #8 11th August 2015 
    amanda1210's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    95
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    It is a typical US government tactic. I don't know why but I guess they just want them all for themselves. But seriously, why hide it when everyone can actually benefit from it? I agree with cnunamaker1. It is possible that they have the cure the world needs, they are just hiding them all for some strange reasons, I guess.
  9. #9 11th August 2015 
    troychard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    99
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Why does it sound like an extra terrestrial story? I mean, there were rumors about the government keeping alien secrets, too, right? It's just funny how FDA allegedly "regulates" drugs. From what I know, overexposure to sun will burn your skin but not really give you melanoma. And who wants to be burned anyways? Great article!
  10. #10 13th August 2015 
    ericnail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I am not surprised. This is not the first thing to be hushed by the government. When the country is run by a group on people who take "donations" from big corporations, the governments best interests seem to align suspiciously close to those of big pharmacy. This is likely just one of many they have 'shut down'.
  11. #11 14th August 2015 
    peptidenoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ericnail View Post
    I am not surprised. This is not the first thing to be hushed by the government. When the country is run by a group on people who take "donations" from big corporations, the governments best interests seem to align suspiciously close to those of big pharmacy. This is likely just one of many they have 'shut down'.
    Sounds like oligarchy to me. Test the drug to "normal" people then pay them to shut up. Oh well, that's how life is I guess. If you do not have money, you know nothing. If you have all the monies in the world, you get the world... and paranoia. Very funny, White House, very funny.
  12. #12 14th August 2015 
    stridee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    57
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I am really surprised that the government would do something like this. Then again, it does not really surprise me in the slightest. I wonder what the government has to gain from a move like this though.
  13. #13 17th August 2015 
    arlene_fits_in's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    93
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    I think it would be profitable for them in a sense that if they nail the right "chemistry," they can auction it to huge pharmaceutical companies for mass production. The government and science pair has always been a mystery. There is always a conspiracy in everything near the government. And it is surprisingly unsurprising. Hahaha!
  14. #14 17th August 2015 
    JSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    123
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Doesn't supprise me at all.. Goverment make huge money out of cancer treatments.. And if someone would find cure for cancers then many people would lose their jobs
  15. #15 17th August 2015 
    Lawrence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    302
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Cancer is multi billion dollar industry. Goverment and other companies that are involved in that industry are suppressing information about cures to keep their bussiness growing
  16. #16 1st September 2015 
    mooray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    172
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Maybe they had a reason to do it it but then again, the government has too many secrets. Sometimes I think there is a conspiracy to reduce the world population significantly through such methods since the planet can barely sustain itself if the human population doubles or triples in the next 50 years.
  17. #17 1st September 2015 
    Wordsmith75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Unfortunately there is a lot of money to be made off of Cancer. I'm not a conspiracy theorist or anything but there is so much that the government has it's hands in.. I'm sure like a lot of things there is a little truth in what people label as conspiracy.
  18. #18 2nd September 2015 
    mscaver86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I agree on so many levels I think that there are cures for many things but unfortunately our government is so greedy that it would be more profitable to provide medicine that one must continue to pay for than just giving the solution which would make more sense but not be profitable.